March 14, 2015
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10152654578131922
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10152654578131922
Both BBC documentary and so called counter-reply named as "United Kingdom's Daughters" are pieces of junks.
.
If anyone wants to sincerely gather opinion of WHOLE population, he will ask right questions. The right question is "who should be punished for a crime" and a WRONG question is "who is 'responsible' for crime" !! And thats true for almost all crimes.
.
Given any crime, when a useless question like "who is responsible for crime?" , some persons depending on their interpretation will blame fate, god, culture, system, lack of precautions taken, criminal, victim etc.
.
BUT IF RIGHT QUESTION IS ASKED that "who should be punished,", then almost all normal citizen will answer as "the criminal".
.
If anyone is sincere about reducing problem, the next question he will put "who laws / precaustions etc do you propose to reduce the problems?
.
If anyone wants to sincerely gather opinion of WHOLE population, he will start with RANDOM selection of persons from a list of whole population such as voter list. No one would pick the person he decides to get opinion of whole population.
.
One thing I would say about people who like these "documetaries" are is that all they want is mudslinging, victims can go to hell. These documetaries would be same as countless documetaries I have seen on poverty. The documetary makers never worked measn to reduce poverty -- because they knew that would reduce emotive appeal of documentary.
.
I havent seen any of the two documetares. And I know both are pieces of junk. And I would reply to classic liberal question"how can you tell a documentary is junk without wasting your 60 minutes of times and seeing !!" My reply is --- " consider a 10 feet deep ditch full of dog cr1p. And imagine someone saying 'see, unless you dive in the ditch, you should not say it is dog-cr1p. and before saying that ditch is full of dog cr1p , you must first dive into it !!!". Same is the argument that "one must see the documentary before speaking against it !!".
.
All in all, pls dont waste time after such "documentaries".
.
Also, the BBC reporter has committed LEGAL crime by showing video of prisoner without prison authority. So our courts / police / HomeMin should have issued arrest warrant against the journalist and started extradition proceedings. And BBC should have been banned in India. But looks like 56" inch is 56 " inch only in demo version, and not real product.
.
If anyone wants to sincerely gather opinion of WHOLE population, he will ask right questions. The right question is "who should be punished for a crime" and a WRONG question is "who is 'responsible' for crime" !! And thats true for almost all crimes.
.
Given any crime, when a useless question like "who is responsible for crime?" , some persons depending on their interpretation will blame fate, god, culture, system, lack of precautions taken, criminal, victim etc.
.
BUT IF RIGHT QUESTION IS ASKED that "who should be punished,", then almost all normal citizen will answer as "the criminal".
.
If anyone is sincere about reducing problem, the next question he will put "who laws / precaustions etc do you propose to reduce the problems?
.
If anyone wants to sincerely gather opinion of WHOLE population, he will start with RANDOM selection of persons from a list of whole population such as voter list. No one would pick the person he decides to get opinion of whole population.
.
One thing I would say about people who like these "documetaries" are is that all they want is mudslinging, victims can go to hell. These documetaries would be same as countless documetaries I have seen on poverty. The documetary makers never worked measn to reduce poverty -- because they knew that would reduce emotive appeal of documentary.
.
I havent seen any of the two documetares. And I know both are pieces of junk. And I would reply to classic liberal question"how can you tell a documentary is junk without wasting your 60 minutes of times and seeing !!" My reply is --- " consider a 10 feet deep ditch full of dog cr1p. And imagine someone saying 'see, unless you dive in the ditch, you should not say it is dog-cr1p. and before saying that ditch is full of dog cr1p , you must first dive into it !!!". Same is the argument that "one must see the documentary before speaking against it !!".
.
All in all, pls dont waste time after such "documentaries".
.
Also, the BBC reporter has committed LEGAL crime by showing video of prisoner without prison authority. So our courts / police / HomeMin should have issued arrest warrant against the journalist and started extradition proceedings. And BBC should have been banned in India. But looks like 56" inch is 56 " inch only in demo version, and not real product.
No comments:
Post a Comment