301.010 : A brief introduction to my “Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa aka Right to Recall” Group (17-Dec-2011) No.042

December 17, 2011

301.010 : A brief introduction to my “Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa aka Right to Recall” Group

https://www.facebook.com/notes/rahul-chimanbhai-mehta-rrg/301010-a-brief-introduction-to-my-prajaa-aadheen-raajaa-aka-right-to-recall-grou/10150423037886922

(for downloading complete PDF , containing 50 chapters on full law-drafts needed to reduce MNC-domination, nepotism in courts, corruption in police/courts/education, improve education, improve Military, reduce cow slaughter, see http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm )

(For index, see notes #301.Index at http://facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150422423416922  )

10.1    The name of the Group

At the time of writing manifesto, my political group is yet unregistered. For registration, I will keep the name as “Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa aka Right to Recall Group” and I will keep the official acronym as PRRRG. In common conversation, I will refer it by following names :

• Right to Recall Group
• Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa Group
• Right to Recall Ministers, Officers, judges Group
• MRMC-Recall Group
• MRCM Group.

The abbreviations I will use will be PRRRG, RRG, MRCM-Recall and RRMOjP, with a lowercase “j” . MRCM stands for “Mineral Royalties for Commons and Military”, and is my key economic motive to form RRG and bringing RTR-PM, RTR-CM, RTR-judges, RTR-RBIG laws etc are my key political motives. The words Ministers, Officers and judges in the title “Right to Recall Ministers, Officers, judges Group” are important for me to tell all that how I differ from those Recallists who insist that Right to Recall should be confined to MLAs, MPs only and must not be applied on Ministers, officers, judges. I categorically say that we are not interested in confining Recall to MLAs and MPs, and I hate all those psuedo-recallists who insist that Recall should be confined to Panchayats, MPs, MLAs only. They are all anti-Recall in reality.

I will also use words RRG aka “Right to Recall Group”. “Right to Recall Group” will be a non-political organization, and will be used to spread information on RTR laws in places where political groups are banned. And another name I will use is “Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa Movement”, as unregistered movement. The words “Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa Cause” will be used to spread the information on RTR etc where other organizations are banned.  

I chose the name “Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa Group aka Right to Recall Group” or MRCM Group or MRCM-RRG because I want the group to be known for its purpose. The purpose of PRRRG is to enact RTI2, RTR, MRCM etc laws and establish the Vedic concept of Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa. And so instead of a catchy generic name with catchy keywords, I chose the name that will reflect core purposes.

=================

10.2    The summary of RRG goal and plan

The RRG goal is a one Gazette Notification issued - nothing more and nothing less. The proposed Gazette Notification namely RTI2-GN described in section-1.2 is the one and only item in RRG goal. And it is absolutely non-negotiable.

What plan do I propose to get these laws passed? The plan I propose is : I will inform as many people as possible about RTI2, MRCM and RTR drafts ; and ask each person who likes RTI2, RTR and MRCM drafts to follow the plan he likes to get these laws passed. And next paragraph describes the plan I like. This is the plan I am perusing as of now is outlined in chap-13. It is not a binding on any RRG member.

============

10.3    Main difference between RRG and other parties

Almost all parties, be new or old, be small or big have same method at core : they insist that citizens must elect their party’s candidates as MPs first. They say that unless citizens elect them as MPs first, there is nothing they can do to improve India. And they promise that once citizens elect them, they will enact laws to improve India, though they don’t disclose the drafts of those laws.

I and my colleagues at RRG differ from them. I don’t ask citizens to elect even one of us to fix India. My request us : if citizens can force existing PM to print RTI2 draft in the Gazette, citizens of India will be able to improve thereafter using RTI2 clauses. This is a major difference between us and rest – my proposed method doesn’t at all depend on requiring citizens to elect us.

Further, no party outlines how they will ensure that their own MPs will not become as corrupt as existing MPs after they win elections. The other parties only give empty statements like “see, you must put faith in some people”. I and my colleagues at RRG differ. We officially claim that we know only one way to ensure that MPs, Ministers etc from our parties will be non-corrupt – the citizens will have to force the existing PM to sign RTI2-draft and using RTI2 draft, citizens should enact Right to Recall laws. And Right to Recall law will ensure that our MPs or other MPs reduce their corruption.

So RRG’s method to improve India involves enacting RTI2 draft as first step,  and enacting more laws and then replace MP, Ministers, IAS, IPS, judges etc if the need be. Most parties method insist on “elect our candidates as MPs” alone as their first step. IMO, their method is flawed because if citizens don’t change laws first, no matter which set of individuals arrive, the corruption will not decrease.

The action items I have worked out for RRG is listed in chap-13 of this book. The actions are clone-positive i.e. if more Right to Recall parties comes in politics and even if they compete, they will add up, not cut each other. The action items need no more than 2-4 hours a week from 200,000 activists. So in terms of time, the RRG method is very efficient.

===========

10.4    My world view on violence, revolution etc

I am against using violence against Ministers, officers, judges, policemen and I am also against using violence against wealthy individuals who own these Ministers, officers and judges. But if officers, Ministers start imprisoning or throwing frivolous Income Tax cases, frivolous Sales Tax cases, frivolous Service Tax cases or frivolous rape cases etc against “Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa” activists, then I will re-think my stand on use of violence against Ministers, officers, judges and particularly the wealthy ones who own the judges, Ministers etc. But till then I oppose violence and every form of violence.

I oppose revolution. I strictly believe in evolution i.e. one small change at a time, which is why each and each of 200 Gazette Notifications I have demanded is one small change at a time. RTI2 draft is just 3 lines, MRCM draft is just 4 pages. RTR-PM is just 1 page and so forth.

==========

10.5    Religion of Democracy and Constitutionalism

I am a devout believer in the Religion of Democracy. I have full and firm faith in the Constitution as interpreted by We the People of India. I see no major compelling need to change the Constitution anymore, though I am not against any demand to amend the Constitution as long as draft of the Amendment is given in writing. I believe that Indian State has been overthrown and usurped by not following the Constitution as interpreted by Citizens and instead imposing the Constitution as interpreted by the judges. And my aim is restoration of the Indian State by making Constitution as interpreted by us Commons as the Supreme force in India.

I dont need modification in Constitution, I only insist we should interpret the Constitution as it was interpreted by the citizens on Jan-25-1950. As on Jan-25-1950, there was no Supreme Court as it is today, and so the only authority to give meanings to the words in the Constitution was the citizenry of India. Now the citizenry has added the word “Democracy” in preamble, which on Jan-25-1950 meant – a regime where majority enacts laws and the majority’s interpretation is final. This has been the definition of Democracy in West since 1200 AD, wherein Jurors interpretation of law was final. This ideal was re-stated in Maryland Constitution Art-23 : “In the trial of all criminal cases, the Jury shall be the Judges of Law, as well as of fact, except that the Court may pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction. The right of trial by Jury of all issues of fact in civil proceedings in the several Courts of Law in this State, where the amount in controversy exceeds the sum of $10,000, shall be inviolably preserved” .

Thus the meaning of word “Democracy” in Constitution on Jan-25-1951 was -- a regime where majority enacts laws and the majority’s interpretation is final. We want restoration of the Constitution with the same meaning.

=======================

10.6    Other books/articles by myself

All Party publications are available for free at http://rahulmehta.com/publications.htm

1. Culture is not the reason : This book has an analysis of causes of the problems in India that no longer exist in West. And book has proofs that culture, religion etc are not the reason. This book, will be available at  rahulmehta.com/304.pdf
2. Right to Recall Group Manifesto : Part-2 : Many topics couldn’t be discussed in part-1 (this book) and I have will discuss in part-2. Part-2 will be available at rahulmehta.com/302.pdf
3. Right to Recall Group Manifesto : Part-3 : Many topics couldn’t be discussed in part-1 (this book) and I have will discuss in part-3. Part-3 will be available at rahulmehta.com/303.pdf
4. Questions on RRG proposals : A list of 1000-2000 multiple choice questions on existing RRG agenda. If a person can answer these questions, he can assume that he knows RRG agenda. Once RRG has over 1000 members, passing a test from these questions will be the only membership condition. This book will be available at rahulmehta.com/305.pdf
5. Questions on Indian Administration : A list of 1000-2000 multiple choice questions on existing Indian administration. This book will be available at http://rahulmehta.com/306.pdf  

===========

10.7    Contacts, Internet communities etc

Following are the important URLs

1. rahulmehta.com : the main website for MRCM-Recall Group
2. http://forum.righttorecall.info   : the main website to post questions
3. google group http://groups.google.com/group/RightToRecall  
4. http://orkut.co.in/Community.aspx?cmm=21780619 : the orkut community
5. Facebook community : http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_154461117936671
6. MehtaRahulC@yahoo.com is my email address , my mobile number is +91-98251-27780

The readers requested to join internet discussion communities such as bharat-rakshak.com, india-forum.com and “Indian Politics” community on orkut. We request readers to campaign without spamming on all internet communities for RRG laws.

=======

10.8    How can YOU help in Prajaa-aadheen Raaja Group?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.pdf . It has several steps where-in you can spend 4 hours a week and help RRG aka Prajaa-aadheen Raajaa Group bring Right to Recall law-drafts in India.