301.051 : If elitemen use violence : The Udham Singh Non-Violence Plan (20-Dec-2011) No.004

December 20, 2011

301.051 : If elitemen use violence : The Udham Singh Non-Violence Plan

https://www.facebook.com/notes/rahul-chimanbhai-mehta-rrg/301051-if-elitemen-use-violence-the-udham-singh-non-violence-plan/10150427449226922

(for downloading complete PDF , containing 50 chapters on full law-drafts needed to reduce MNC-domination, nepotism in courts, corruption in police/courts/education, improve education, improve Military, reduce cow slaughter, see http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm )

(For index, see notes #301.Index at http://facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150422423416922  )

If elitemen decide to throw Dictatorship on India or use rampant violence and harassment otherwise , then if as low as 500 Udhams (Singhs) decide to execute The Udham Singh Non-violence Plan, then that Dictatorship can be overthrown or violence from elitemen may end. How?

1. Most important part is that the Udham must work alone and should not ever form an organization. If one reads history, he will notice that Bhagat Singh lost because of  some Vibhishans in his group. And no one can build a Lanka which doesn’t have Vibhishan. If all the good people in Hindustan Socialist Revolution Party were working solo, they would have been more effective against criminals like Sanders, and could have given inspiration to many more and could have created deeper threats inside British. But because they formed a group, and there will always be a Vibhishan in the group,  they all got caught and killed, and they could execute just one criminal Sanders. So last mistake an Udham should do is to form a group. Because 1 out of 10 people in such group will be a Vibhishan, and would lead to arrest or death of rest 9.
2. Each Udham should work alone, and randomly pick a senior Indian economic or political elitemen. Amongst economic elitemen, he must not touch those who are working via labor like doctors or engineers or those who are in cut-throat competitive business, but pick the ones who have illegitimate and illegal  oligopolies or monopolies on natural resources or licenses or SEZ. Or some political eliteman who is equivalent to Dwyer.
3. An Udham should deal with these Dwyer in small or large numbers. The larger the number, better. And higher the position, better. And also take into account that very high positions can be very risky.
4. The Udham should “non-violently” act on these Dwyers. Pls note that Udham must not use violence as used by elitemen of India, but Udham must follow the non-violent path shown by Mahatma Udham Singh.

Whether an Udham works alone or work in a group, he will die anyway. But if Udhams decide to work in group of say 10 or 50 Udhams, and if even one member in his group is a Vibhishan, all Udhams will die without dealing with even one Dwyer. Whereas if these 10 to 50 Udhams work solo, it is guaranteed that each will manage to deal with at least one to ten Dwyers before he dies.  So expected number of dealings are higher if the Udhams work in solo than in group.

If in first year, if 10 Udhams show up, many would be inspired and follow his footsteps.

The threads of Udhams will break the morale of all the Dwyers in economic and political elite and they will reduce violence.

I don’t need to elaborate any further. Any intelligent reader would understand what I have written.