November 23, 2011
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/278978898811048
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/278978898811048
Folks,
Say you are contesting case against some. Say his lawyer makes and argument and your lawyer deliberately remains silent. What impression that would give to the judge or audience at large? They will think that you have weak case. And why would your lawyer remain silent even if he has strong points to make? Because he has sold out.
Well, yesterday, Pranav Mukherjee said that RTR is impractical. And as expected, neither The Big Anna nor any of The Chote Anna gave any response. Why? Because The Anna and all The Chote Anna want to create impression that RTR is indeed impractical. And then they will demand Right to reject and ask activists to wind up.
As I had said on Ap-8, The Anna is psuedo-recallists, and his deliberate silence when anti-recallists oppose RTR prove this.
No comments:
Post a Comment