January 15, 2016 No.2
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10153235258531922
About silence of "activists" on key issues -- lack of time or deliberate?
.
(1) An activist is either active OR he is DELIBERATELY inactive
.
(2) An activist who has a stand on lesser issue will ALWAYS have a stand on a more important issue.
.
(3) If an activist is vocal on one issue, and silent on a more important issue , then his silence is 100% deliberate. And if activist has stand on one issue, but no stand on a less important issue, then silence can be due to lack of time.
.
(4) An activist is silent on MORE IMPORTANT issue ONLY because he supports status quo or his party-line and he wants to hide the fact that he supports status quo and / or his party-line.
.
(5) Many activist declare that "they will act ONLY if and when he recieves orders from his apex leaders and otherwise he will never act". Such activists evaluated ONLY from his actions and never his intentions. Because he himself has declared that his own intentions have no value even in his own mind, and only think that matters to him "orders from apex".
.
(6) If an activists should be evaluated ONLY by his actions and NOT by his declared intensions, because anyone can lie about intentions. And if one wants to cite his intentions, then he should be open and willing for narcotest in public.
.
(7) The above rules apply ONLY on activists and dont apply on normal-passivists and "active-passivists".. (Normal passivist is a person who agrees he has no solutions, he aggrees he has very little time for politics, he listens to what paidmedia or activists around him say and makes decisions / opinions on what he hears. Active-passivist is a person who wants activists to come to him, take down suggestions and raise campaign to implement his suggestions.)
.
Based on above common sense, you can evaluate different activists.
.
=====
.
Now many activists from Congress , BJP , AAP, Swaraj Abhiayan (started by mahatimepass Yogendra Yadav and super-eminent PIL-trader Prashant Bhushan), RSS, BST , CPM etc will sometimes say "I support Right to recall". . Please ask him to give link to the DRAFT he supports on his FB-wall. And he will ALWAYS say "I dont want to waste my time in posting drafts on my wall" !! IOW, he has all the time in world for slogan shouting on how wall and outside FB, worshipping SoMoKe on his wall etc. But he has no time to post RTR-drafts that he claims he supports !!! IOW, They are just a psudo-recallist.
.
Next , RSS-apex's actions are now clearly anti-India. RSS-apex opposes laws to remove govt control over temples, and insists on putting RSS-men to control temple trusts. eg NaMo refused to create an SGPC like structure over Somnath Temple, and instead appointed BJP / RSS .leaders over Somnath Temple. And RSS-apex has opposed law-drafts to create SGOC like structure over.
.
Now what about RSS-workers? Many RSS-workers claim that they want temples to be free from govt control. Then what about NaMo's decision to appoint BJP-leaders and RSS-leaders to run Somnath temple? And why not instead have SGPC like Hindu body to run Somnath Temple? RSS-workers' promot reply is "we will oppose the proposal to create SGPC like body over Somnath Temple, because we have orders from top to oppose it, and we are 'disciplines soldiers" !!!
.
So when it comes to "principles" , RSS-workers oppose Govt control over temples. And due to "discipline", they support govt control over Somnath Temple , and so they keep a thundering silence on proposal to create SGPC like structure over Somnath Temple !!! Such silence is NOT due to lack of time, Such silence is deliberate.
.
Likewise, AAPians and ArGandhi talk tall on "commitment of AAP and commitment of ArGandhi on RTR".. But when one asks them to give drafts, they ArGandhi-andbhagats and AAPians say "lack of time". IOW, their silence is deliberate.
.
Working with such "active on one issue and deliberately inactive on higher issue" is nothing but timepass. Such activists work for their organizations and leaders ONLY and dont care much about society, country or even their own causes.
.
So my request to all activists is
.
1. Please ask EVERY fellow activists to show , on his wall, which law-drafts he has supported to deal with IMPORTANT problems
.
2. And if he insists on silence, then dismiss that activist as timepass
.
3. And work with activists who are working to publicize law-drafts to address IMPORTANT issues
.
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10153235258531922
About silence of "activists" on key issues -- lack of time or deliberate?
.
(1) An activist is either active OR he is DELIBERATELY inactive
.
(2) An activist who has a stand on lesser issue will ALWAYS have a stand on a more important issue.
.
(3) If an activist is vocal on one issue, and silent on a more important issue , then his silence is 100% deliberate. And if activist has stand on one issue, but no stand on a less important issue, then silence can be due to lack of time.
.
(4) An activist is silent on MORE IMPORTANT issue ONLY because he supports status quo or his party-line and he wants to hide the fact that he supports status quo and / or his party-line.
.
(5) Many activist declare that "they will act ONLY if and when he recieves orders from his apex leaders and otherwise he will never act". Such activists evaluated ONLY from his actions and never his intentions. Because he himself has declared that his own intentions have no value even in his own mind, and only think that matters to him "orders from apex".
.
(6) If an activists should be evaluated ONLY by his actions and NOT by his declared intensions, because anyone can lie about intentions. And if one wants to cite his intentions, then he should be open and willing for narcotest in public.
.
(7) The above rules apply ONLY on activists and dont apply on normal-passivists and "active-passivists".. (Normal passivist is a person who agrees he has no solutions, he aggrees he has very little time for politics, he listens to what paidmedia or activists around him say and makes decisions / opinions on what he hears. Active-passivist is a person who wants activists to come to him, take down suggestions and raise campaign to implement his suggestions.)
.
Based on above common sense, you can evaluate different activists.
.
=====
.
Now many activists from Congress , BJP , AAP, Swaraj Abhiayan (started by mahatimepass Yogendra Yadav and super-eminent PIL-trader Prashant Bhushan), RSS, BST , CPM etc will sometimes say "I support Right to recall". . Please ask him to give link to the DRAFT he supports on his FB-wall. And he will ALWAYS say "I dont want to waste my time in posting drafts on my wall" !! IOW, he has all the time in world for slogan shouting on how wall and outside FB, worshipping SoMoKe on his wall etc. But he has no time to post RTR-drafts that he claims he supports !!! IOW, They are just a psudo-recallist.
.
Next , RSS-apex's actions are now clearly anti-India. RSS-apex opposes laws to remove govt control over temples, and insists on putting RSS-men to control temple trusts. eg NaMo refused to create an SGPC like structure over Somnath Temple, and instead appointed BJP / RSS .leaders over Somnath Temple. And RSS-apex has opposed law-drafts to create SGOC like structure over.
.
Now what about RSS-workers? Many RSS-workers claim that they want temples to be free from govt control. Then what about NaMo's decision to appoint BJP-leaders and RSS-leaders to run Somnath temple? And why not instead have SGPC like Hindu body to run Somnath Temple? RSS-workers' promot reply is "we will oppose the proposal to create SGPC like body over Somnath Temple, because we have orders from top to oppose it, and we are 'disciplines soldiers" !!!
.
So when it comes to "principles" , RSS-workers oppose Govt control over temples. And due to "discipline", they support govt control over Somnath Temple , and so they keep a thundering silence on proposal to create SGPC like structure over Somnath Temple !!! Such silence is NOT due to lack of time, Such silence is deliberate.
.
Likewise, AAPians and ArGandhi talk tall on "commitment of AAP and commitment of ArGandhi on RTR".. But when one asks them to give drafts, they ArGandhi-andbhagats and AAPians say "lack of time". IOW, their silence is deliberate.
.
Working with such "active on one issue and deliberately inactive on higher issue" is nothing but timepass. Such activists work for their organizations and leaders ONLY and dont care much about society, country or even their own causes.
.
So my request to all activists is
.
1. Please ask EVERY fellow activists to show , on his wall, which law-drafts he has supported to deal with IMPORTANT problems
.
2. And if he insists on silence, then dismiss that activist as timepass
.
3. And work with activists who are working to publicize law-drafts to address IMPORTANT issues
.
No comments:
Post a Comment