February 10, 2016 No.1
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10153280189431922
If paid-Rajdeep-Sardesai etc were anti-NaMo , then why didnt they asked NaMo some direct question on "reservation"? No matter what answer NaMo ghad given he would have lost votes !!
.
Moral of the story is --- Rajdeep Sardesai and NaMo both have common sponsors. NaMo has to look after their interests and the sponsors pay Rajdeep to make statements that appear as anti-NaMo , but actually increase votes of NaMo !!!
.
If paidmediamen had raised CBR = caste based reservation issue, then NaMo would have either lost upper caste voters , and activists OR lost SC / ST / OBC voters or both.
.
But so called anti-NaMo paidmediamen such as paid-Rajdeep-Sardesai or others never tried to corner NaMo on issue of CBR = caste based reservation.
.
In the minds of many upper caste voters, NaMo had created an anti-reservation image. He never made any anti-reservation statement, but he created image using gestures, and his sponsored created using paidmedia, eg NaMo projected himself as a no-nonsense person who has come up on hhis own merits, Since anti-reservation people consider reservation as nonsense, they got fooled into believing that NaMo is anti-reservation, Also, most anti-reservation people consier reservation as appeasement, And NaMo and his sponsors paid paidmediamen to create an image that "NaMo never does any appeasement, goes by merit only etc etc". And all these gestures and paidmedia created image that NaMo is anti-reservation, .
.
At the same time, NaMo never made any statement against CBR, And so SC / ST / OBC assumed that he will be like other BJP leaders -- pro-CBR.
.
Now such "dudh danhi" i.e. "taking advantage from BOTH sides": needs support of ALL powerful media-sponsors. Because even one powerful media sponsors can burst the balloon by merely raising the issue,. Once the issue is raised, NaMo will be forced to answer, and no matter what answer he gives -- he will lose some voters from one or both sides.
.
If paidmediamen such as paid-rajdeep-Sardesai or paid-Arnab-Goswami (who as per one rumor earns Rs 5 crore per year or salary, PLUS bonuses) were anti-NaMo, then could have raised reservation issue,. And done substantial damage to NaMo.
.
But they didnt.
.
The reason is --- neither NaMo nor paid-Rajdeep not paid-Arnab decide what to do and which issues to raise.
.
NaMo's sponsors and paid-Rajdeep's sponosr are same people OR they decided to cut deal. The deal was --- NaMo would serve interests of these sponsors and in return, paid-Rajdeep's sonsors will ensure that paid-rajdeep doesnt raise reservation issue till NaMo becomes PM.
.
At the same time, paid-Rajdeep was asked to bark again and again and again that "NaMo is anti-muslim , NaMo is anti-muslim". So both the muslim voters who had voted for BJP in 2009 became anti-BJP. And the barking added some 1 crore to 4 crore Hindu voters !! So was paid-Rajdeep anti-NaMo? And is he fool? Well, paid-Rajdeep is neither anti-NaMo nor fool. He does what his sponsors tell him to do.
.
And now that NaMo has become, PM, to ensure that he doesnt become too popular and doesnt become too powerful, these sponsors are raising reservation issue by giving extensive paid media coverage to anti-reservation-activists as well as pro-reservation-activists !!
.
So paidmediamen are NOT anti-NaMo as you all may be thinking because of mere statements etc they make
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10153280189431922
If paid-Rajdeep-Sardesai etc were anti-NaMo , then why didnt they asked NaMo some direct question on "reservation"? No matter what answer NaMo ghad given he would have lost votes !!
.
Moral of the story is --- Rajdeep Sardesai and NaMo both have common sponsors. NaMo has to look after their interests and the sponsors pay Rajdeep to make statements that appear as anti-NaMo , but actually increase votes of NaMo !!!
.
If paidmediamen had raised CBR = caste based reservation issue, then NaMo would have either lost upper caste voters , and activists OR lost SC / ST / OBC voters or both.
.
But so called anti-NaMo paidmediamen such as paid-Rajdeep-Sardesai or others never tried to corner NaMo on issue of CBR = caste based reservation.
.
In the minds of many upper caste voters, NaMo had created an anti-reservation image. He never made any anti-reservation statement, but he created image using gestures, and his sponsored created using paidmedia, eg NaMo projected himself as a no-nonsense person who has come up on hhis own merits, Since anti-reservation people consider reservation as nonsense, they got fooled into believing that NaMo is anti-reservation, Also, most anti-reservation people consier reservation as appeasement, And NaMo and his sponsors paid paidmediamen to create an image that "NaMo never does any appeasement, goes by merit only etc etc". And all these gestures and paidmedia created image that NaMo is anti-reservation, .
.
At the same time, NaMo never made any statement against CBR, And so SC / ST / OBC assumed that he will be like other BJP leaders -- pro-CBR.
.
Now such "dudh danhi" i.e. "taking advantage from BOTH sides": needs support of ALL powerful media-sponsors. Because even one powerful media sponsors can burst the balloon by merely raising the issue,. Once the issue is raised, NaMo will be forced to answer, and no matter what answer he gives -- he will lose some voters from one or both sides.
.
If paidmediamen such as paid-rajdeep-Sardesai or paid-Arnab-Goswami (who as per one rumor earns Rs 5 crore per year or salary, PLUS bonuses) were anti-NaMo, then could have raised reservation issue,. And done substantial damage to NaMo.
.
But they didnt.
.
The reason is --- neither NaMo nor paid-Rajdeep not paid-Arnab decide what to do and which issues to raise.
.
NaMo's sponsors and paid-Rajdeep's sponosr are same people OR they decided to cut deal. The deal was --- NaMo would serve interests of these sponsors and in return, paid-Rajdeep's sonsors will ensure that paid-rajdeep doesnt raise reservation issue till NaMo becomes PM.
.
At the same time, paid-Rajdeep was asked to bark again and again and again that "NaMo is anti-muslim , NaMo is anti-muslim". So both the muslim voters who had voted for BJP in 2009 became anti-BJP. And the barking added some 1 crore to 4 crore Hindu voters !! So was paid-Rajdeep anti-NaMo? And is he fool? Well, paid-Rajdeep is neither anti-NaMo nor fool. He does what his sponsors tell him to do.
.
And now that NaMo has become, PM, to ensure that he doesnt become too popular and doesnt become too powerful, these sponsors are raising reservation issue by giving extensive paid media coverage to anti-reservation-activists as well as pro-reservation-activists !!
.
So paidmediamen are NOT anti-NaMo as you all may be thinking because of mere statements etc they make
No comments:
Post a Comment