Dear Tall-Leader-Bhagats (23-Aug-2012) No.3

August 23, 2012

https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10151000747631922

Dear Tall-Leader-Bhagats ,

The most important thing is not dressing, style, smart-talk etc etc but ability and courage to draft out administrative laws that can stop local officers from taking bribes, prepare nation against war and revert infiltration. How does your tall-leader rank on those 3 things? Corruption of middle staff, war and infiltration (like Bangladeshi infiltration) the ultimate realities that every nation has to face sooner or later. And no amount of smart-talk, no amount of media management, no amount of fancy dress competition and no amount of marketing skills etc can sway warring enemy or an infiltrator. Smart-talk, media-management and marketing skills may work on less informed citizens, but have no impact on determined enemy or infiltrator.

====

Duratma Gandhi was one of the most "successful" leader. He was successful in the sense that he "outsmarted" all leaders such as Lala Lajpat Rai, Subhashchandra Bose etc and became more visible than all congress leaders. He was was very innovative with fancy dress competition and was best dressed leader by his time. He was most charismatic leader of his time. Everyone around him praised him (and those who didn't praise him got purged). But could he save lakhs of Hindus in Pakistan from getting killed and kidnapped? NO. So he was the biggest failure leader in India. Or, he was a successful leader who failed the nation.

Likewise, Jawaharlal Ghazi was "successful" in becoming PM , staying PM for 16 long years and decimating all leaders in Congress. But could he prepare India against Chinese war? NO. So Jawaharlal Ghazi was a failure. Or, he as a successful leader who failed the nation.

In contrast, Lal Bahadur Shashtri was successful in waging war. So I call him a truly successful leader, though he wasnt well dressed and didnt have any marketing skills.

Devi Indira Amma IMO was least failure or most successful leader in India. She waged war and divided Pakistan into two. But now look at her failures. Devi Indira Amma could not stop CIA from bribing a High Court judge and making him give judgment against her, which damaged her big time. Nor could Devi Indira Amma stop staff below her at State\District levels from taking bribes and unleashing atrocities in 1975-77. Nor could Devi Indira Amma stop CIA from funding newspapers and unleashing a smear campaign against her. And later, she could not stop CIA and Pakistan from aiding Khalistani terrorists, and ended with up a situation where he had to send Army into Golden Temple. She had all the marketing skills, but no amount of marketing skills helped her against CIA. CIA could checkmate her.

====

Now lets rank existing leaders on these crucial points. Lets ignore all petty skills like media-management, marketing skills etc. And lets see
(1)can they control corruption in junior staff
(2)can they expel infiltrators
(3)can they prepare India for war against China
(4)can they prepare India for war against USA

Pls write in comments --- how does pet leader evaluate on above 4 points?

===

If I rank existing leaders against the problem of (1)controlling corruption in junior staff and (2) Bangladeshi infiltration, ALL of them are colossal failures.

One can wash away responsibilities of some state-level tall leaders. But all these leaders have been national leaders and could have created mass movement to enact laws to expel Bangladeshies and stop them from coming. But none of our existing leaders have even tried. All existing leaders chose to ignore the problems. Why? Because the Saudi Arabian lobby which sponsors the Bangladeshi infiltration has warned each leader that any leader who tries to enact laws to expel Bangladeshi will suffer badly, and all leaders cowed down due to this threat. This itself shows how weak all our existing leaders are.

So pls re-evaluate your tall leaders along above 4 areas, and re-mmake your mind, whether you still want to campaign for tall-leaders or campaign for good law-drafts.