September 13, 2015 No.6
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10153032114091922
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10153032114091922
(Q1) Why has India been behind USUK ? (Q2) And why is strength ratio of India / USUK worsening everyday? (Q3) What are the possible outcomes of worsening strength ratio? (Q4) And what can we activists to to improve India / USUK strength ratio?
.
Here , I have given my answers and compared with answers given by SoMoKe, CoBhAp-leaders, RSS-apex, eminent Diseconomists (Anarthshashtri) , eminent Paid Journalists and experts in the subject of Political Superstitions.
.
====SUMMARY===
.
IMO, the MOST important questions in Indian politics/history are the 4 questions I mentioned above , namely (Q1) Why has India been behind USUK since 100s of years ? (Q2) And why is strength ratio of India / USUK worsening everyday? (Q3) What are the possible outcomes of worsening strength ratio? (Q4) And what can we activists to improve India / USUK strength ratio? .
.
I have given my answers, and I have compared and contrasted my answers with answers given by SoMoKe , CoBhAp-leaders, RSS-apex and several experts in the field of Political Superstitions, Diseconomics aka Anarthshashtra , Photojournalism , Paidhistory etc etc
.
My answers are --- (A1 / A2) USUK is ahead due to (a) Jury System (b) multi-elections (c) right to recall (d) referendum (A3) if strength ratio of USUK / India keeps declining then USUK will re-takeover India the way UK took over India in 1750-1800. (A4) activists should work to bring these 4 law-draft-systems in India
.
Here , I have given my answers and compared with answers given by SoMoKe, CoBhAp-leaders, RSS-apex, eminent Diseconomists (Anarthshashtri) , eminent Paid Journalists and experts in the subject of Political Superstitions.
.
====SUMMARY===
.
IMO, the MOST important questions in Indian politics/history are the 4 questions I mentioned above , namely (Q1) Why has India been behind USUK since 100s of years ? (Q2) And why is strength ratio of India / USUK worsening everyday? (Q3) What are the possible outcomes of worsening strength ratio? (Q4) And what can we activists to improve India / USUK strength ratio? .
.
I have given my answers, and I have compared and contrasted my answers with answers given by SoMoKe , CoBhAp-leaders, RSS-apex and several experts in the field of Political Superstitions, Diseconomics aka Anarthshashtra , Photojournalism , Paidhistory etc etc
.
My answers are --- (A1 / A2) USUK is ahead due to (a) Jury System (b) multi-elections (c) right to recall (d) referendum (A3) if strength ratio of USUK / India keeps declining then USUK will re-takeover India the way UK took over India in 1750-1800. (A4) activists should work to bring these 4 law-draft-systems in India
SoMoKe have avoided these questions, and not given any answers to (Q1 to Q3). What is appalling is that SoMoKe show US as the best friend of India, and support FDI , which is just a tool to create repatriation crisis and re-takeover India. None show worsening India / USUK strength ratio as a problem.As per answering (Q4) , i.e. what activists should do to improve India, SoMoKe's answer is --- activists should do SoMoKe-puja and nothing else !!
.
CoBhAp-leaders's give same answer as SoMoKe.
.
RSS-apex claims that USUK are ahead than India because we Indians have poor National Character and Indians are divided. IOW, the administrative differences I mentioned such as JurySys , multi-elections , RTR etc play zero role in their opinion. RSS-apex is at least better than CoBhAp-leaders that they atleast do mention that worsening strength ratio of India / USUK is a problem and that can result into re-takeover of India. And what does RSS-apex suggest activists should do to improve so called "national character" and reduce disunity? First, RSS-apex opposes the claim that law-drafts play important role and discourages activists to spend time in understanding law-drafts, Second RSS-apex has always asked its middle officers to inform activists that "RTR will bring instability ; JurySys is trash because Indians are stupid and so forth". And thirdly, RSS-apex says that by attending Shakha , by doing physical exercises , by doing social work , by not creating any political alternative and then finally vote gathering for BJP ----- India / USUK strength ratio can be improved !! I will later show why IMO their thesis as well as remedies are all hogwash.
.
The professors in subject Political Superstitions (wrongly known as Political Science), claim that difference in strengths of India and USUK is due to "Political Culture" of Americans and India. IOW, as per these Political Superstitionists , calling themselves as Political Scientists, Indians have INFERIOR political culture while Americans have SUPERIOR political culture, And thats the ONLY reason in their opinions, They too completely disregard the role of the 4 law-draft-sets I mentioned namely JurySys, Multi-elections, RTR and referendum. And what solution do they propose to activists? More analysis and more analysis and more analysis !!! None of these experts in subject of Political Superstitions have proposed even one line of law-draft to reduce the mess.
.
IMO , it is time activists debunk SoMoKe , CoBhAp-leaders, Political Superstitionists and work to publicize these law-drafts. Or else, India might get re-tookover by USUK.
.
===== CHAPTERS =====
.
==== DETIALS ====
.
1. Why is USUK ahead of India in ALL fields? My answers vs answers of RSS-apex , SoMoKe , Political Superstitionists
.
My answers , to the question why USUK is ahead of India , is that USUK has several superior law-drafts which we havent followed and many activists dont even know about. The law-drafts-sets are
.
(1.1) Jury System
.
JurySys was IMO invented by Greeks in around 700 BC , and then practiced by Romans , and then it vanished. Later, Vikings started using JurySys in around 600 AD. And as they took over Europe part by part, Jury System started spreading. It first came in UK in 950 AD as Coronor's Jury System, and then came in broader form voia Magna Carta in around 1100 AD. USA too Jury System to a much higher level and made Jury Trials constitutional rights for criminal, civil as well as tax trials. UK's MPs banned Jury Trial for civil cases in around 1950 and later tax trials as well. And so did all European countries.
.
British introduced .Jury System in India in 1870s. But Indi'a PM Jawaherlal Ghazi , Indian MPs of all parties, the then Supreme Court judges and Indian intellectuals including professors of Political Superstition, opposed Jury System and abolished Jury System in 1956.
.
The Jury System reduces the problem of
.
(1.1.1) Judicious Nepotism
(1.1.2) Judicious Nexuses
(1.1.3) Judicious fear of favourable transfer , suspension, expulsion
(1.1.4) Judicious greed for promotion and favourable transfers
.
The Judicious Nepotism is when one judge favors his relative lawyers. And Judicious Nexuses is when a judge has nexus with his relative lawyer or friend lawyer or an elitemen or a criminal who has several cases in his court. Judicious fear of unfavorable transfer , suspension, expulsion is when a lower court judge gives judgement based on fear that judges in higher court will transfer him to unfavorable place or will suspend him or expel him. And so he he obeys the higher judges' orders and so the super-elitemen who have nexuses with higher judges benefit. "Judicious greed for promotion and favourable transfers" is when a judge in lower court obeys judge in higher court for greed of promotion and favourable transfers. So the super-elitemen , big lawyers etc who have nexuses with higher judges benefit.
.
The Jury System has no possibility of fear of transfer, suspension, expulsion as each Juror retires anyway after the case. And Jury has no greed for promotions. Now say an accused has 10 lawyers and each of them has 100 relatives. So there are 1000 citizens relatives of his lawyers. So what are chances that one of the Juror, selected from voter list of say 10,00,000 voters is relative of one of those 10 lawyers? Below 1%. And what the chances that 2 out of 12 Jurors are relatives? What are the chances that 3 out of 12 lawyers are relatives? IOW, chances of nepotism are far far less in Jury System then in judge system.
.
And in same way , chances of nexuses are also far far less in Jury System compared to judge system.
.
The details of Jury System are in chap-21 ofhttp://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . And FB-notes are at "301.021 : RRG proposals to reduce Nepotism in Courts : Expel judges , bring in Jury" athttps://facebook.com/notes/10150423336436922 . And pls also see "303.015 : A summary of courts of India, ex-USSR, China and USA ; Indians courts are most nexused/nepotic/corrupt of ALL four " at
https://facebook.com/notes/10151189109886922 .
.
The Jury System , compared to judge system, does far far less bad job, of protecting small factory owners from large factory owners'' attempts to damage small factory owners using contacts at apex levels in Govt. How and why? Consider 10 large factory owners say L1 to L10, Consider 10000 small factory owners say S1 to S10000 . Say there are 25 Supreme judges SCj1 to SCj25 and 20000 Lower Court judges named LCj1 to LCj20000.
.
Now S1 to S10000 may or may not have nexuses with LCj1 to LC20000 , but very few of S1 to S10000 will have nexuses with SCj1 to SCj25. And L1 to L10 will have nexuses with one or more SCj1 to SCj25 , but not even 1% of LCj1 to LCj20000. But SCjs have control over LCjs. And L1 to L10, using their nexuses with SCj1 to SCj25 , will manage to force LCjs to give verdicts that will force S1 to S20000 out of business !!!
.
Whereas in Jury System in each case against S1 to S10000 , the 12-50 Jurors are chosen at random from voter list of lakhs of voters. And so L1 to L10 have no means to bribe or force lakhs and lakhs of Jurors scattered across the country.
.
So the Jury System , compared to judge system, does far far LESS BAD job, of protecting small factory owners from large factory owners'' attempts to damage small factory owners using contacts at apex levels in Govt.
.
Thats the reason why countries which practised Jury System always managed to make better industrial tools and weapons compared to countries which practised judge system. eg Greeks had better weapons that Egypt, Turkey, Iran, India. UK had better weapons than whole world. And USA today has far better tools as well weapons compared to whole world.
.
Jury System also ensures that lower staff in administration will restrain itself from corrupt / harassing behavior. Because in judge system, a complaint of corruption goes to a judge with whom most officers already have nexuses. Whereas in Jury System, the accused officer will have no nexuses over the Jurors who will decide the case. In fact, officer will not even know which Jurors will come to decide his case. So officers in countries with Jury System are less prone to corruption, and have less tendency to cause harassments.
.
So IMO , Jury System related law-drafts is important reason why UK, which was behind India in 950 AD , became ahead of India by 1200 AD and way ahead of India by 1600 AD. And JurySys is important reason why today USA is ahead of whole world.
.
What do SoMoKe , RSS-apex and Political Superstitionists say about JurySys?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe have opposed Jury System. eg ArGandhi refused to print Jury System clauses in his proposed Janlokpal law-draft,. And in constitutional amendment that NaMo printed for Judiciary in year 2014, NaMo refused to print Jury System related clauses. Each and every CoBhAp-leader has been anti-Jury pro-judge.
.
RSS-apex too have always been anti-Jury pro-judge. eg in 1950s , when Jawaherlal Ghazi killed Jury System. the then RSS-leaders and Jansangh leaders had supported his proposal. RSS-apex never asked its middle layer to inform activists about Jury System.
.
In India, the experts in the subject of Political Superstition (wrongly called as Political Science) too have ALWAYS opposed Jury System. Thats why, none of them even tell students about Jury System in their classes. And no political science textbook in India makes any attempt to inform students about Jury System. The reason why textbook writers refused to inform students about Jury System was because the textbook writers were paid by elitemen not to write about Jury System.
.
===
.
(1.2) Right to Recall law-drafts
.
USA has Right to Recall law-drafts over almost all State / District level positions. USA has no RTR over any Federal positions, be elected or appointed. But USA does have RTR law-drafts for most positions in state / district Govts.
.
In many states, there are formal procedures for Right to Recall over
.
1 Governor, Vice-Governor
2. State Ministers
3. State Public Prosecutors
4. State Judges
5. MLAs aka Assemblymen
.
6. District Police Chiefs aka Sheriff
7. District Education Officer
8. District Public Prosecutors
9. District Judges
10. District \ City Mayor
11. District \ City Councillors
.
in many cases, recall procedures are normally laid down. In many cases, recall procedures are not stated , but via referendum , citizens can implement a recall
.
In many cases, officer can be unelected and appointed, and yet there are recall
procedures over his head.
.
RTR law-drafts in USA has ensured that the apex officers do not become corrupt and do maintain an optimum level of efficiency. At least, they will try to match efficiencies of other persons who are holding similar positions in other districts/states. So say there are 2000 police chiefs in USA. And say 1% of them bring several innovations. Then sooner or later, all district police chiefs will have to implement those innovations or else chances of their recall do increase.
.
Further, the nodal officers also try to ensure that lower officers are non-corrupt. Because if one lower officers becomes corrupt, and if he goes on and on unpunished, then chances that more officers become corrupt increases. And if too many lower officers become corrupt , then citizens will blame him of poor supervision and chances of his recall increases. This is the main reason why all apex officers in USA do set trap on their officers if they are suspected of corruption.And lower officers also know that apex officers do set traps occasionalty. And so they almos always remain far far less corrupt than officers at corresponding positions in India and other countries which dont have Right to Recall over apex officers.
.
USA has RTR over most positions at State / District levels. But USA has no RTR at elected or appointed positions in Central Govt. This is the reason why Central Govt in USa is far far more corrupt than State / District Govts.
.
And the reason why Jury System is alive in USA is also RTR over judges, prosecutors, police chiefs, Mayor etc. And since there is no RTR in Federal Govt, Jury System in Federal Court has become very weak.
.
So IMO Right to Recall law-drafts have played important role in make USA a far far less unproductive place than India.
.
What do SoMoKe , RSS-apex and Political Superstitionists say about RTR ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe have opposed Right to Recall. All CoBhAp-leaders have opposed RTR. ArGandhi gae lip service to RTR , but his intention always has been to kill RTR. Which is why ArGandhi refused to print RTR-Janlokpal clauses in the Janlokpal draft. And ArGandhi always opposed RTR over PoliceChief , judgesm public prosecutors and even District Education Officers.
.
RSS-apex has always opposed RTR. RTR in India was first proposed by Ahmisamurty Mahatma Chandrashekhar Azad in 1925, RSS-apex had opposed it. Ahmisamurty Mahatma Chandrashekhar Azad in 1925 had said "In this Republic [of India, that we wish to create] , the electors shall have the right to recall their representatives, if so desired, otherwise the democracy shall become a mockery." !! IOW, Mahatma Chandrashekhar Azad considered "democracy without recall" as a joke. !! RSS-apex has always tried to convince (or fool?) RSS-activists that "RTR will bring instability" and that correct way to reduce corruption etc isnt RTR , but create 100s of MPs, 1000s of MLAs , 100s of Ministers, 1000s of IAS / IPS with strong national character and strong moral character !! IOW, RSS-apex has always projected "installing national character and installing moral character" as better alternative than RTR etc , and opposed RTR by claiming that RTR will cause instability and increase corruption !!!
.
The "experts" in subject of Political Superstition (wrongly named as Political Science) have opposed RTR in India. In fact, they are so much against RTR , that they have refused to even mention in Political Superstition textbooks \ lectures that USA has RTR over district judges, police chiefs , public prosecutors, district education officers, state judges etc. The reason why textbook writers of Political Superstition hide this is because elitemen have paid them to hide it.
.
===
.
(1.3) Multi-elections
.
In India only following persons in power structure are elected --- Loksabha MP , State MLA , City Corporator (or District / Tahsil/ Gram Panchayat Members in rural areas). PM, CM, Mayor are elected by MPs, MLAs and Corporators and not by citizens. And all officers such as police chief, district education officer, judges, prosecutors etc are all appointed and / or recruited by written exams, and then promoted by other officers / Ministers
.
In USA , following officials are directly elected by voters
.
1. President , Vice President i.e. PM , Deputy PM
2. Senator i.e. Rajsabha MP
(no other officials in Central Govt)
.
3. Representative i.e. Loksabha MP
4. Governor , Vice Governor i.e. CM , deputy CM
5. State MLA, member of leguslative council
6. State Public Prosecutor
7. One to three important ministers eg Agriculture Minister in Kansas
8. State Supreme Court judges i.e. our High Court judges
(varies from state to state. eg some states dont have elected judges)
.
9. District Police Chief aka Sheriff
10. District judges
11. District Public Prosecutors
12. District Education Officers
13. District Mayor
14. District Councilors
(varies from district to district)
.
IOW, a large number of positions are directly elected by citizens.
.
So there are more elected officials in US administration that India . This reduces power of appointed officers against citizens , and also, makes each elected officer independent of other elected officer and makes him individually accountable to citizens.
.
Multi-elections are .possible ONLY if the administrative system has RTR and also Jury Trials. Why is RTR must for multi-elections? I will explain my later statues. Pls click follow on my FB profile to get that status
.
Further , in India, MPs elect PM and MLAs elect CM. Now citizens do want a specific person to become PM and have dislike for other specific competitors. And "who should be made PM" is important question. So most voters decide that Mr. X should be PM, and that automatically ensured that they must vote for MP of Mr. X. IOW, voters across India are now electing only 3 persons --- PM , Cm and their Mayor.
.
When a few individuals are elected, the large factory oiwners , by building nexuses with those few individuals or gaining ability to pressurize those few individuals with paidmedia, manage to print law-drafts that will ensure that small factory owners suffocate. And this reduces competition in economy.
.
IMO, multi-election is a powerful factor why USA is more competitive. Multi-election makes it lot for difficult for large players in economy to print law-drafts that will make life of small players more difficult.In India, the large factory owners easily manage to print law-drafts that will make it difficult for small factory owners to grow. One example is GST-law-draft, excise-law-draft and so forth.
.
UK had elections for MP and City Councilors only. But UK in 1840s did introduce election for Education Board Members. The "experts" in the field of Political Superstition in India have refused to give this information to students of India. The direct election of Education Board Members , coupled with Jury System over staff of Education Dept, dramatically improved education in UK.
.
So IMO, multi-election is important reason why USA is far far ahead of India.
.
What do SoMoKe, RSS-apex , Political Superstitionists say on multi-elections?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe and CoBhAp-leaders have all opposed multi-elections. RSS-apex has also opposed multi-elections. RSS-apex never asked its middle layer of Pracharaks to inform activists about multi-election system in USA.
.
The "experts" in the field of Political Superstition insist that multi-elections is insignificant reason why USA is ahead of India. Which is why in their lectures or textbooks, they have refused to even inform the students that USA has multi-elections. Which is why very few students in India even know that USA has multi-election system. The textbooks of Political Superstitions dont even mention that USA has elected judges, elected public prosecutors, elected police chiefs and so forth. The most important reason is ---- the elitemen in India have paid authors of textbooks of Political Superstitions that multi-election feature of US polity should not be mentioned in textbooks of India.
.
So all in all, we activists at Right to Recall Group are the only activists in India trying to bring multi-election law-drafts in India. We have proposed to bring "defacto multi-election" on 100s of positions in Central Govt, State Govt and District Govt using Right to Recall law-dradts.
.
====
.
(1.4) Referendum law-drafts
.
Many European countries have referendum law-drafts which they use to remove "bad" law-drafts that their MPs support, and impose "good" law-drafts, that their MPs oppose. Also, referendum system works as good recall procedure. The referendum procedure also ensure that law-makers will not make outrightly defunct laws to please their elitemen or foreign elitemen.
.
USA doesnt have referendum at Central Govt levels, which is why US's Central Govt has gone out of control, creating massive scams in Banking, Medicine and also a massive loot in the name of "War on Drugs". Whereas USA has been having referendum system at state / district levels , and so state / district administration has been far far less corrupt.
.
Referendum-law-draft is useful in protecting as well as creating law-drafts for Jury System RTR, multi-elections etc. In absence of referendum law-drafts, it becomes easy for foreign elitemen to bribe / force MPs to print laws to weaken JurySys , RTR , multi-elections etc
.
In India, we the activists at Right to Recall Group have been supporting / publicizing TCP-law-draft (see section-1.3 of "301.001 : The Zero -- 3 line law can reduce poverty, corruption, MNC domination in 4 months " at
https://facebook.com/notes/10150422433266922 ) , which IMO is less expensive than referendum procedures used by US-states and US-districts. and much faster. The plus or minus point of TCP over referendum-procedure used by US-states and US-states is that in TCP , yes-no given by citizens will become publicly know to all along with name and voter-id of citizens.
.
What do SoMoKe, RSS-apex , Political Superstitionists say on referendum ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe have opposed referendum procedures, except ArGandhi , who will insist on referendum on topics he approves !! eg ArGandi supported referendum on "should Delhi be made full state" but opposes nationwide referendum on Ram Janambhoomi Devalaya issue.!! This is oppurtunism and a nonsense at best. Referendum has to include all topics that "a % of voters" want and any and EVERY issue that pass the number's test. TCP has all this features built into it.
.
RSS-apex has always opposed referendum procedures. Even on art-370 issue, RJB issue and common civil code issue, RSS-apex opposed NATIONWIDE referendum. RSS-apex also opposed nationwide referendum on 2-child-law-drafts. The excuse RSS-apex gives is that "we are in business of improving national character and moral character, and we are in business of bringing unity amongst Indians and we are NOT in referendum business".Then how to bring law-drafts that are good for nation and MPs oppose? RSS-apex's replies is "we will create MPs full of moral character and national character , who will print the law-drafts that the nation needs".
.
RSS-apex's duplicity can be seen. If RSS-apex TRULY believes in NOT supporting law-drafts, then why did RSS-spokesperson Ram Madhav support Janlokpal bill of Anna in year 2011? IOW, RSS-apex does believe in supporting law-drafts when it needed. It takes "law-drafts are not important , what is important is moral character and national character" stand when it comes to law-drafts like Referendum-law-drafts or TCP-law-drafts. And when it comes to Janlokpal-law-draft, RSS-apex does change the stand to "law-drafts are also important".
.
The "experts" in the field of Political Superstitions (wrongly known as Political Science) in India have opposed the proposal for enacting referendum procedure in India, None has ever proposed any law-draft to implement referendum law-draft in India.
.
====
.
(1.5) Summary of my answers and others' answers to "why USUK are ahead of India and getting more and more ahead"
.
My answer to the question "why US is ahead" are -- (a) JurySys-law-drafts , (b) RTR-law-drafts (c) multi-election-law-drafts and (d) referendum-law-drafts. And these law-drafts have rise to many law-drafts such as absence of excise, absence of GST / VAT , presence of wealth tax etc etc.
.
SoMoKe and CoBhAp-leaders have largely ignored this question. And they have opposed these law-drafts,. and they propose SoMoKe-andhbhakti as method by which gap between India and US can be overcome.RSS-apex has always opposed these law-drafts and refused to accept that these law-drafts are the reasons why USA is ahead of India. RSS-apex says that "gap between USA and India can be overcome by improving national character, improving moral characetr and by bringing unity in Indians , and law-drafts are NOT important !!! ".
.
The experts in the subject of Political Superstitions (wrongly named as Political Science) claim that "USA is ahead of India because Political Culture of Americans is superior than Political Culture.
.
====
.
2. And why is strength ratio of India / USUK worsening everyday?
.
Same answers as in (1). They have these 4 law-draft-sets, while Indian activists are NOT forcing their MPs to print these law-drafts. The gap between India and USUK keeps widening
.
SoGa says that India is falling behind due to communalism, and particularly due to Hindu Communalism !!
.
NaMo says that India is falling behind because NaMo isnt PM. So make NaMo PM and India will become at par with USA in a few years !!
.
ArGandhi gives "lack of Janlokpal" as reason
.
RSS-apex gives lack of moral character and lack of national character as reason.
.
And experts in the field of Political Superstition cite the reason as "poor political culture".
.
And so forth.
.
CoBhAp-leaders's give same answer as SoMoKe.
.
RSS-apex claims that USUK are ahead than India because we Indians have poor National Character and Indians are divided. IOW, the administrative differences I mentioned such as JurySys , multi-elections , RTR etc play zero role in their opinion. RSS-apex is at least better than CoBhAp-leaders that they atleast do mention that worsening strength ratio of India / USUK is a problem and that can result into re-takeover of India. And what does RSS-apex suggest activists should do to improve so called "national character" and reduce disunity? First, RSS-apex opposes the claim that law-drafts play important role and discourages activists to spend time in understanding law-drafts, Second RSS-apex has always asked its middle officers to inform activists that "RTR will bring instability ; JurySys is trash because Indians are stupid and so forth". And thirdly, RSS-apex says that by attending Shakha , by doing physical exercises , by doing social work , by not creating any political alternative and then finally vote gathering for BJP ----- India / USUK strength ratio can be improved !! I will later show why IMO their thesis as well as remedies are all hogwash.
.
The professors in subject Political Superstitions (wrongly known as Political Science), claim that difference in strengths of India and USUK is due to "Political Culture" of Americans and India. IOW, as per these Political Superstitionists , calling themselves as Political Scientists, Indians have INFERIOR political culture while Americans have SUPERIOR political culture, And thats the ONLY reason in their opinions, They too completely disregard the role of the 4 law-draft-sets I mentioned namely JurySys, Multi-elections, RTR and referendum. And what solution do they propose to activists? More analysis and more analysis and more analysis !!! None of these experts in subject of Political Superstitions have proposed even one line of law-draft to reduce the mess.
.
IMO , it is time activists debunk SoMoKe , CoBhAp-leaders, Political Superstitionists and work to publicize these law-drafts. Or else, India might get re-tookover by USUK.
.
===== CHAPTERS =====
.
==== DETIALS ====
.
1. Why is USUK ahead of India in ALL fields? My answers vs answers of RSS-apex , SoMoKe , Political Superstitionists
.
My answers , to the question why USUK is ahead of India , is that USUK has several superior law-drafts which we havent followed and many activists dont even know about. The law-drafts-sets are
.
(1.1) Jury System
.
JurySys was IMO invented by Greeks in around 700 BC , and then practiced by Romans , and then it vanished. Later, Vikings started using JurySys in around 600 AD. And as they took over Europe part by part, Jury System started spreading. It first came in UK in 950 AD as Coronor's Jury System, and then came in broader form voia Magna Carta in around 1100 AD. USA too Jury System to a much higher level and made Jury Trials constitutional rights for criminal, civil as well as tax trials. UK's MPs banned Jury Trial for civil cases in around 1950 and later tax trials as well. And so did all European countries.
.
British introduced .Jury System in India in 1870s. But Indi'a PM Jawaherlal Ghazi , Indian MPs of all parties, the then Supreme Court judges and Indian intellectuals including professors of Political Superstition, opposed Jury System and abolished Jury System in 1956.
.
The Jury System reduces the problem of
.
(1.1.1) Judicious Nepotism
(1.1.2) Judicious Nexuses
(1.1.3) Judicious fear of favourable transfer , suspension, expulsion
(1.1.4) Judicious greed for promotion and favourable transfers
.
The Judicious Nepotism is when one judge favors his relative lawyers. And Judicious Nexuses is when a judge has nexus with his relative lawyer or friend lawyer or an elitemen or a criminal who has several cases in his court. Judicious fear of unfavorable transfer , suspension, expulsion is when a lower court judge gives judgement based on fear that judges in higher court will transfer him to unfavorable place or will suspend him or expel him. And so he he obeys the higher judges' orders and so the super-elitemen who have nexuses with higher judges benefit. "Judicious greed for promotion and favourable transfers" is when a judge in lower court obeys judge in higher court for greed of promotion and favourable transfers. So the super-elitemen , big lawyers etc who have nexuses with higher judges benefit.
.
The Jury System has no possibility of fear of transfer, suspension, expulsion as each Juror retires anyway after the case. And Jury has no greed for promotions. Now say an accused has 10 lawyers and each of them has 100 relatives. So there are 1000 citizens relatives of his lawyers. So what are chances that one of the Juror, selected from voter list of say 10,00,000 voters is relative of one of those 10 lawyers? Below 1%. And what the chances that 2 out of 12 Jurors are relatives? What are the chances that 3 out of 12 lawyers are relatives? IOW, chances of nepotism are far far less in Jury System then in judge system.
.
And in same way , chances of nexuses are also far far less in Jury System compared to judge system.
.
The details of Jury System are in chap-21 ofhttp://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . And FB-notes are at "301.021 : RRG proposals to reduce Nepotism in Courts : Expel judges , bring in Jury" athttps://facebook.com/notes/10150423336436922 . And pls also see "303.015 : A summary of courts of India, ex-USSR, China and USA ; Indians courts are most nexused/nepotic/corrupt of ALL four " at
https://facebook.com/notes/10151189109886922 .
.
The Jury System , compared to judge system, does far far less bad job, of protecting small factory owners from large factory owners'' attempts to damage small factory owners using contacts at apex levels in Govt. How and why? Consider 10 large factory owners say L1 to L10, Consider 10000 small factory owners say S1 to S10000 . Say there are 25 Supreme judges SCj1 to SCj25 and 20000 Lower Court judges named LCj1 to LCj20000.
.
Now S1 to S10000 may or may not have nexuses with LCj1 to LC20000 , but very few of S1 to S10000 will have nexuses with SCj1 to SCj25. And L1 to L10 will have nexuses with one or more SCj1 to SCj25 , but not even 1% of LCj1 to LCj20000. But SCjs have control over LCjs. And L1 to L10, using their nexuses with SCj1 to SCj25 , will manage to force LCjs to give verdicts that will force S1 to S20000 out of business !!!
.
Whereas in Jury System in each case against S1 to S10000 , the 12-50 Jurors are chosen at random from voter list of lakhs of voters. And so L1 to L10 have no means to bribe or force lakhs and lakhs of Jurors scattered across the country.
.
So the Jury System , compared to judge system, does far far LESS BAD job, of protecting small factory owners from large factory owners'' attempts to damage small factory owners using contacts at apex levels in Govt.
.
Thats the reason why countries which practised Jury System always managed to make better industrial tools and weapons compared to countries which practised judge system. eg Greeks had better weapons that Egypt, Turkey, Iran, India. UK had better weapons than whole world. And USA today has far better tools as well weapons compared to whole world.
.
Jury System also ensures that lower staff in administration will restrain itself from corrupt / harassing behavior. Because in judge system, a complaint of corruption goes to a judge with whom most officers already have nexuses. Whereas in Jury System, the accused officer will have no nexuses over the Jurors who will decide the case. In fact, officer will not even know which Jurors will come to decide his case. So officers in countries with Jury System are less prone to corruption, and have less tendency to cause harassments.
.
So IMO , Jury System related law-drafts is important reason why UK, which was behind India in 950 AD , became ahead of India by 1200 AD and way ahead of India by 1600 AD. And JurySys is important reason why today USA is ahead of whole world.
.
What do SoMoKe , RSS-apex and Political Superstitionists say about JurySys?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe have opposed Jury System. eg ArGandhi refused to print Jury System clauses in his proposed Janlokpal law-draft,. And in constitutional amendment that NaMo printed for Judiciary in year 2014, NaMo refused to print Jury System related clauses. Each and every CoBhAp-leader has been anti-Jury pro-judge.
.
RSS-apex too have always been anti-Jury pro-judge. eg in 1950s , when Jawaherlal Ghazi killed Jury System. the then RSS-leaders and Jansangh leaders had supported his proposal. RSS-apex never asked its middle layer to inform activists about Jury System.
.
In India, the experts in the subject of Political Superstition (wrongly called as Political Science) too have ALWAYS opposed Jury System. Thats why, none of them even tell students about Jury System in their classes. And no political science textbook in India makes any attempt to inform students about Jury System. The reason why textbook writers refused to inform students about Jury System was because the textbook writers were paid by elitemen not to write about Jury System.
.
===
.
(1.2) Right to Recall law-drafts
.
USA has Right to Recall law-drafts over almost all State / District level positions. USA has no RTR over any Federal positions, be elected or appointed. But USA does have RTR law-drafts for most positions in state / district Govts.
.
In many states, there are formal procedures for Right to Recall over
.
1 Governor, Vice-Governor
2. State Ministers
3. State Public Prosecutors
4. State Judges
5. MLAs aka Assemblymen
.
6. District Police Chiefs aka Sheriff
7. District Education Officer
8. District Public Prosecutors
9. District Judges
10. District \ City Mayor
11. District \ City Councillors
.
in many cases, recall procedures are normally laid down. In many cases, recall procedures are not stated , but via referendum , citizens can implement a recall
.
In many cases, officer can be unelected and appointed, and yet there are recall
procedures over his head.
.
RTR law-drafts in USA has ensured that the apex officers do not become corrupt and do maintain an optimum level of efficiency. At least, they will try to match efficiencies of other persons who are holding similar positions in other districts/states. So say there are 2000 police chiefs in USA. And say 1% of them bring several innovations. Then sooner or later, all district police chiefs will have to implement those innovations or else chances of their recall do increase.
.
Further, the nodal officers also try to ensure that lower officers are non-corrupt. Because if one lower officers becomes corrupt, and if he goes on and on unpunished, then chances that more officers become corrupt increases. And if too many lower officers become corrupt , then citizens will blame him of poor supervision and chances of his recall increases. This is the main reason why all apex officers in USA do set trap on their officers if they are suspected of corruption.And lower officers also know that apex officers do set traps occasionalty. And so they almos always remain far far less corrupt than officers at corresponding positions in India and other countries which dont have Right to Recall over apex officers.
.
USA has RTR over most positions at State / District levels. But USA has no RTR at elected or appointed positions in Central Govt. This is the reason why Central Govt in USa is far far more corrupt than State / District Govts.
.
And the reason why Jury System is alive in USA is also RTR over judges, prosecutors, police chiefs, Mayor etc. And since there is no RTR in Federal Govt, Jury System in Federal Court has become very weak.
.
So IMO Right to Recall law-drafts have played important role in make USA a far far less unproductive place than India.
.
What do SoMoKe , RSS-apex and Political Superstitionists say about RTR ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe have opposed Right to Recall. All CoBhAp-leaders have opposed RTR. ArGandhi gae lip service to RTR , but his intention always has been to kill RTR. Which is why ArGandhi refused to print RTR-Janlokpal clauses in the Janlokpal draft. And ArGandhi always opposed RTR over PoliceChief , judgesm public prosecutors and even District Education Officers.
.
RSS-apex has always opposed RTR. RTR in India was first proposed by Ahmisamurty Mahatma Chandrashekhar Azad in 1925, RSS-apex had opposed it. Ahmisamurty Mahatma Chandrashekhar Azad in 1925 had said "In this Republic [of India, that we wish to create] , the electors shall have the right to recall their representatives, if so desired, otherwise the democracy shall become a mockery." !! IOW, Mahatma Chandrashekhar Azad considered "democracy without recall" as a joke. !! RSS-apex has always tried to convince (or fool?) RSS-activists that "RTR will bring instability" and that correct way to reduce corruption etc isnt RTR , but create 100s of MPs, 1000s of MLAs , 100s of Ministers, 1000s of IAS / IPS with strong national character and strong moral character !! IOW, RSS-apex has always projected "installing national character and installing moral character" as better alternative than RTR etc , and opposed RTR by claiming that RTR will cause instability and increase corruption !!!
.
The "experts" in subject of Political Superstition (wrongly named as Political Science) have opposed RTR in India. In fact, they are so much against RTR , that they have refused to even mention in Political Superstition textbooks \ lectures that USA has RTR over district judges, police chiefs , public prosecutors, district education officers, state judges etc. The reason why textbook writers of Political Superstition hide this is because elitemen have paid them to hide it.
.
===
.
(1.3) Multi-elections
.
In India only following persons in power structure are elected --- Loksabha MP , State MLA , City Corporator (or District / Tahsil/ Gram Panchayat Members in rural areas). PM, CM, Mayor are elected by MPs, MLAs and Corporators and not by citizens. And all officers such as police chief, district education officer, judges, prosecutors etc are all appointed and / or recruited by written exams, and then promoted by other officers / Ministers
.
In USA , following officials are directly elected by voters
.
1. President , Vice President i.e. PM , Deputy PM
2. Senator i.e. Rajsabha MP
(no other officials in Central Govt)
.
3. Representative i.e. Loksabha MP
4. Governor , Vice Governor i.e. CM , deputy CM
5. State MLA, member of leguslative council
6. State Public Prosecutor
7. One to three important ministers eg Agriculture Minister in Kansas
8. State Supreme Court judges i.e. our High Court judges
(varies from state to state. eg some states dont have elected judges)
.
9. District Police Chief aka Sheriff
10. District judges
11. District Public Prosecutors
12. District Education Officers
13. District Mayor
14. District Councilors
(varies from district to district)
.
IOW, a large number of positions are directly elected by citizens.
.
So there are more elected officials in US administration that India . This reduces power of appointed officers against citizens , and also, makes each elected officer independent of other elected officer and makes him individually accountable to citizens.
.
Multi-elections are .possible ONLY if the administrative system has RTR and also Jury Trials. Why is RTR must for multi-elections? I will explain my later statues. Pls click follow on my FB profile to get that status
.
Further , in India, MPs elect PM and MLAs elect CM. Now citizens do want a specific person to become PM and have dislike for other specific competitors. And "who should be made PM" is important question. So most voters decide that Mr. X should be PM, and that automatically ensured that they must vote for MP of Mr. X. IOW, voters across India are now electing only 3 persons --- PM , Cm and their Mayor.
.
When a few individuals are elected, the large factory oiwners , by building nexuses with those few individuals or gaining ability to pressurize those few individuals with paidmedia, manage to print law-drafts that will ensure that small factory owners suffocate. And this reduces competition in economy.
.
IMO, multi-election is a powerful factor why USA is more competitive. Multi-election makes it lot for difficult for large players in economy to print law-drafts that will make life of small players more difficult.In India, the large factory owners easily manage to print law-drafts that will make it difficult for small factory owners to grow. One example is GST-law-draft, excise-law-draft and so forth.
.
UK had elections for MP and City Councilors only. But UK in 1840s did introduce election for Education Board Members. The "experts" in the field of Political Superstition in India have refused to give this information to students of India. The direct election of Education Board Members , coupled with Jury System over staff of Education Dept, dramatically improved education in UK.
.
So IMO, multi-election is important reason why USA is far far ahead of India.
.
What do SoMoKe, RSS-apex , Political Superstitionists say on multi-elections?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe and CoBhAp-leaders have all opposed multi-elections. RSS-apex has also opposed multi-elections. RSS-apex never asked its middle layer of Pracharaks to inform activists about multi-election system in USA.
.
The "experts" in the field of Political Superstition insist that multi-elections is insignificant reason why USA is ahead of India. Which is why in their lectures or textbooks, they have refused to even inform the students that USA has multi-elections. Which is why very few students in India even know that USA has multi-election system. The textbooks of Political Superstitions dont even mention that USA has elected judges, elected public prosecutors, elected police chiefs and so forth. The most important reason is ---- the elitemen in India have paid authors of textbooks of Political Superstitions that multi-election feature of US polity should not be mentioned in textbooks of India.
.
So all in all, we activists at Right to Recall Group are the only activists in India trying to bring multi-election law-drafts in India. We have proposed to bring "defacto multi-election" on 100s of positions in Central Govt, State Govt and District Govt using Right to Recall law-dradts.
.
====
.
(1.4) Referendum law-drafts
.
Many European countries have referendum law-drafts which they use to remove "bad" law-drafts that their MPs support, and impose "good" law-drafts, that their MPs oppose. Also, referendum system works as good recall procedure. The referendum procedure also ensure that law-makers will not make outrightly defunct laws to please their elitemen or foreign elitemen.
.
USA doesnt have referendum at Central Govt levels, which is why US's Central Govt has gone out of control, creating massive scams in Banking, Medicine and also a massive loot in the name of "War on Drugs". Whereas USA has been having referendum system at state / district levels , and so state / district administration has been far far less corrupt.
.
Referendum-law-draft is useful in protecting as well as creating law-drafts for Jury System RTR, multi-elections etc. In absence of referendum law-drafts, it becomes easy for foreign elitemen to bribe / force MPs to print laws to weaken JurySys , RTR , multi-elections etc
.
In India, we the activists at Right to Recall Group have been supporting / publicizing TCP-law-draft (see section-1.3 of "301.001 : The Zero -- 3 line law can reduce poverty, corruption, MNC domination in 4 months " at
https://facebook.com/notes/10150422433266922 ) , which IMO is less expensive than referendum procedures used by US-states and US-districts. and much faster. The plus or minus point of TCP over referendum-procedure used by US-states and US-states is that in TCP , yes-no given by citizens will become publicly know to all along with name and voter-id of citizens.
.
What do SoMoKe, RSS-apex , Political Superstitionists say on referendum ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe have opposed referendum procedures, except ArGandhi , who will insist on referendum on topics he approves !! eg ArGandi supported referendum on "should Delhi be made full state" but opposes nationwide referendum on Ram Janambhoomi Devalaya issue.!! This is oppurtunism and a nonsense at best. Referendum has to include all topics that "a % of voters" want and any and EVERY issue that pass the number's test. TCP has all this features built into it.
.
RSS-apex has always opposed referendum procedures. Even on art-370 issue, RJB issue and common civil code issue, RSS-apex opposed NATIONWIDE referendum. RSS-apex also opposed nationwide referendum on 2-child-law-drafts. The excuse RSS-apex gives is that "we are in business of improving national character and moral character, and we are in business of bringing unity amongst Indians and we are NOT in referendum business".Then how to bring law-drafts that are good for nation and MPs oppose? RSS-apex's replies is "we will create MPs full of moral character and national character , who will print the law-drafts that the nation needs".
.
RSS-apex's duplicity can be seen. If RSS-apex TRULY believes in NOT supporting law-drafts, then why did RSS-spokesperson Ram Madhav support Janlokpal bill of Anna in year 2011? IOW, RSS-apex does believe in supporting law-drafts when it needed. It takes "law-drafts are not important , what is important is moral character and national character" stand when it comes to law-drafts like Referendum-law-drafts or TCP-law-drafts. And when it comes to Janlokpal-law-draft, RSS-apex does change the stand to "law-drafts are also important".
.
The "experts" in the field of Political Superstitions (wrongly known as Political Science) in India have opposed the proposal for enacting referendum procedure in India, None has ever proposed any law-draft to implement referendum law-draft in India.
.
====
.
(1.5) Summary of my answers and others' answers to "why USUK are ahead of India and getting more and more ahead"
.
My answer to the question "why US is ahead" are -- (a) JurySys-law-drafts , (b) RTR-law-drafts (c) multi-election-law-drafts and (d) referendum-law-drafts. And these law-drafts have rise to many law-drafts such as absence of excise, absence of GST / VAT , presence of wealth tax etc etc.
.
SoMoKe and CoBhAp-leaders have largely ignored this question. And they have opposed these law-drafts,. and they propose SoMoKe-andhbhakti as method by which gap between India and US can be overcome.RSS-apex has always opposed these law-drafts and refused to accept that these law-drafts are the reasons why USA is ahead of India. RSS-apex says that "gap between USA and India can be overcome by improving national character, improving moral characetr and by bringing unity in Indians , and law-drafts are NOT important !!! ".
.
The experts in the subject of Political Superstitions (wrongly named as Political Science) claim that "USA is ahead of India because Political Culture of Americans is superior than Political Culture.
.
====
.
2. And why is strength ratio of India / USUK worsening everyday?
.
Same answers as in (1). They have these 4 law-draft-sets, while Indian activists are NOT forcing their MPs to print these law-drafts. The gap between India and USUK keeps widening
.
SoGa says that India is falling behind due to communalism, and particularly due to Hindu Communalism !!
.
NaMo says that India is falling behind because NaMo isnt PM. So make NaMo PM and India will become at par with USA in a few years !!
.
ArGandhi gives "lack of Janlokpal" as reason
.
RSS-apex gives lack of moral character and lack of national character as reason.
.
And experts in the field of Political Superstition cite the reason as "poor political culture".
.
And so forth.
======
.
(3) What are the possible outcomes of worsening strength ratio?
.
IMO, the rising gap between strength can result into re-enslavement of India.
.
What do SoMoKe, RSS-apex , Political Superstitionists say ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe ignore the question. And worse, they project USA as best friend of India and are openly pro-FDI. FDI is a tool to create repatriation crisis and thus force the nation to sell all its assets.
.
RSS-apex is at least admitting that worsening strength ratio is a problem.
.
Experts in the subject of Political Superstition dont consider rising gap between strength of India and USA as a problem !!
.
====
.
(4) And what can we activists to improve India / USUK strength ratio? .
.
IMO, activists should study proposed law-drafts such as .JurySys-drafts , RTR-law-drafts, TCP-law-drafts aka referendum-law-drafts , multi-election-law-drafts , wealth tax law-drafts and several such law-drafts.
.
Next, activists should decide which law-drafts should be printed in the Gazette of India. Next, activists should post / share those drafts on his FB wall and also send orders to MPs via SMS , and SMS should have link to the drafts.that the activists supports. Activists should also give newspaper advt to publicize these law-drafts. And he should explain the law-drafts to others, and then ask them to share the drafts on their FB-walls as well as send orders to MPs via SMS to print those law-drafts. That way, it will become clear which activists refuse to support these law-drafts.This will reduce the influence of those activists amongst those who support these law-drafts.
.
Finally, pressure on SoMoKe and CoBhAp-leaders to print these law-drafts will increase. And that way, chances that these law-drafts would get printed in the Gazette of India will increase. And then India will start catching up with USUK.
.
What do SoMoKe, RSS-apex , Political Superstitionists say ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe insist that , in order to catch up with USA, activists should confine to SoMoKe-andhbhakti !! And activists MUST oppose law-drafts that SoMoKe dont approve or cant support.
.
RSS-apex insist that to catch up with USA, activists should attend shakha, do exercises, and confine to social work given by RSS-apex. And when election comes, activists should gather votes for BJP. RSS-apex insists that activists MUST not spend time in studying law-drafts of USA / UK etc and should not campaign to bring similar law-drafts in India !!!
.
The experts in the subject of Political Superstitions (wrongly known as Political Science) insist that activists should confine to studying textbooks in Political Superstitions. They also oppose proposal , that activists should campaign for specific law-drafts. IOW, they propose "stay inactive" to activists
..
======================
.
5. Summary
.
SoMoKe, RSS-apex and Political Superstitions have largely ignored the question why USUK is ahead of India. The reasons they give are --- difference in Political Culture, difference in National Character, lack of unity etc etc. IMO, these reasons are nonsense.these reasons are nonsense. And they downplay the question "what can be result of rising gaps in strengths of India and USA",
.
And above all, SoMoKe, RSS-apex and Political Superstitionists have opposed the law-drafts as RTR, JurySys, referendum and multi-elections,
.
And in their opinion, activists who want to improve India should confine to SoMoKe-andhbhakti , attend RSS-shakha, do social work, shout slogans, and MUST NOT campaign for the law-drafts !! The experts of subject Political Superstition also dont insist on law-draft based activism.
.
My answers are all oppossite to their answers. IMO, USUK is ahead because of law-drafts such as RTR-drafts, JurySys, referendum and multi-elections, and many more. And IMO, activists should , using newspaper advt, SMS and FB-posts, publicize these law-drafts , and reduce supporters of MPs / Leaders who oppose these law-drafts. So as leaders' activist base weakens, SoMoKe will be forcd to print these law-drafts/.
.
(3) What are the possible outcomes of worsening strength ratio?
.
IMO, the rising gap between strength can result into re-enslavement of India.
.
What do SoMoKe, RSS-apex , Political Superstitionists say ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe ignore the question. And worse, they project USA as best friend of India and are openly pro-FDI. FDI is a tool to create repatriation crisis and thus force the nation to sell all its assets.
.
RSS-apex is at least admitting that worsening strength ratio is a problem.
.
Experts in the subject of Political Superstition dont consider rising gap between strength of India and USA as a problem !!
.
====
.
(4) And what can we activists to improve India / USUK strength ratio? .
.
IMO, activists should study proposed law-drafts such as .JurySys-drafts , RTR-law-drafts, TCP-law-drafts aka referendum-law-drafts , multi-election-law-drafts , wealth tax law-drafts and several such law-drafts.
.
Next, activists should decide which law-drafts should be printed in the Gazette of India. Next, activists should post / share those drafts on his FB wall and also send orders to MPs via SMS , and SMS should have link to the drafts.that the activists supports. Activists should also give newspaper advt to publicize these law-drafts. And he should explain the law-drafts to others, and then ask them to share the drafts on their FB-walls as well as send orders to MPs via SMS to print those law-drafts. That way, it will become clear which activists refuse to support these law-drafts.This will reduce the influence of those activists amongst those who support these law-drafts.
.
Finally, pressure on SoMoKe and CoBhAp-leaders to print these law-drafts will increase. And that way, chances that these law-drafts would get printed in the Gazette of India will increase. And then India will start catching up with USUK.
.
What do SoMoKe, RSS-apex , Political Superstitionists say ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SoMoKe insist that , in order to catch up with USA, activists should confine to SoMoKe-andhbhakti !! And activists MUST oppose law-drafts that SoMoKe dont approve or cant support.
.
RSS-apex insist that to catch up with USA, activists should attend shakha, do exercises, and confine to social work given by RSS-apex. And when election comes, activists should gather votes for BJP. RSS-apex insists that activists MUST not spend time in studying law-drafts of USA / UK etc and should not campaign to bring similar law-drafts in India !!!
.
The experts in the subject of Political Superstitions (wrongly known as Political Science) insist that activists should confine to studying textbooks in Political Superstitions. They also oppose proposal , that activists should campaign for specific law-drafts. IOW, they propose "stay inactive" to activists
..
======================
.
5. Summary
.
SoMoKe, RSS-apex and Political Superstitions have largely ignored the question why USUK is ahead of India. The reasons they give are --- difference in Political Culture, difference in National Character, lack of unity etc etc. IMO, these reasons are nonsense.these reasons are nonsense. And they downplay the question "what can be result of rising gaps in strengths of India and USA",
.
And above all, SoMoKe, RSS-apex and Political Superstitionists have opposed the law-drafts as RTR, JurySys, referendum and multi-elections,
.
And in their opinion, activists who want to improve India should confine to SoMoKe-andhbhakti , attend RSS-shakha, do social work, shout slogans, and MUST NOT campaign for the law-drafts !! The experts of subject Political Superstition also dont insist on law-draft based activism.
.
My answers are all oppossite to their answers. IMO, USUK is ahead because of law-drafts such as RTR-drafts, JurySys, referendum and multi-elections, and many more. And IMO, activists should , using newspaper advt, SMS and FB-posts, publicize these law-drafts , and reduce supporters of MPs / Leaders who oppose these law-drafts. So as leaders' activist base weakens, SoMoKe will be forcd to print these law-drafts/.
No comments:
Post a Comment