August 15, 2015
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10152975089236922
Centralized funding vs Decnetralized / Individualized funding --- A key difference between CoBhAp and RRG , with REAL example.
.
BJP and AAP have one similarity with COngress. All three parties' leaders insist on sending funds / contributions to head office and the tall leader at head office !!! Where as we at RRG request all activists to give contribution to LOCAL senior activist ONLY !!!
.
Consider the most important goal we have --- giving 10000s of newspaper advt across Indian newspapers to inform citizens of India about law-drafts such as TCP-draft, MRCM-draft, JurySys-draft, RTR-drafts etc etc/
.
One way, namely CoBhAp way is --- I could have asked all RRG activists across India to send donations to myself and then decided in which newspaper I give what advt.
.
Second way, which I called as RRG way is --- let each activist decide which senior activist he wants to contribute how much rupee, and let that senior activist give newspaper advt to promote these drafts.
.
Obviously, I took the second way.
.
CoBhAp and SoMoKe insist on first way i.e. centralized fund gathering because they do NOT want other leaders and other proposals to grow !!! They are basically for self-promotion ONLY. They are all control freaks ONLY.
.
We at RRG want the proposals to grow. The activists will grow as proposals grow , because thought can move without thinkers and campaigners. But at center is the though i.e. law-drafts and NOT any faces.
.
So finally, two Right to Recall senior activists of Bhilwara namely Pawan Kumar and Ashok Jain publicized that they want to give newspaper advt in Bhilwara Bhasker to inform citizens about Jury System. So the junior activistS DIRECTLY gave money to them. My role in co-rodination , fund collection and fund dispending was --- zero.
.
Here is the link to the newspaper advt they gave -----https://www.facebook.com/pawan.jury/posts/796836247101280
.
In CoBhAp / RSS , if activists had given newspaper advt without headquaters' aadesh i.e. order, the headquater would have taken disciplinary action against them and suspended them !!!
.
Whereas we at RRG ask more and more activists to work with LOCAL senior activists and give advts !!!
.
====
.
So if you want to save India from MNC-owners' FDI, Missionaries conversions etc, then please work to publicize the law-drafts and pls stop neta-puja. Pls publicize law-drafts such as TCP-draft. MRCM = DDMRCAM drafts, JurySys drafts, wealth tax drafts, RTR-drafts, law drafts to remove Govt control over Hindu temples, law-drafts to save cows, law-drafts to expel Bangladeshi etc.
.
Please give contribution to LOCAL senior activist you trust so that he can give newspaper advt to promote these drafts.
.
Thanks in advace.
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10152975089236922
Centralized funding vs Decnetralized / Individualized funding --- A key difference between CoBhAp and RRG , with REAL example.
.
BJP and AAP have one similarity with COngress. All three parties' leaders insist on sending funds / contributions to head office and the tall leader at head office !!! Where as we at RRG request all activists to give contribution to LOCAL senior activist ONLY !!!
.
Consider the most important goal we have --- giving 10000s of newspaper advt across Indian newspapers to inform citizens of India about law-drafts such as TCP-draft, MRCM-draft, JurySys-draft, RTR-drafts etc etc/
.
One way, namely CoBhAp way is --- I could have asked all RRG activists across India to send donations to myself and then decided in which newspaper I give what advt.
.
Second way, which I called as RRG way is --- let each activist decide which senior activist he wants to contribute how much rupee, and let that senior activist give newspaper advt to promote these drafts.
.
Obviously, I took the second way.
.
CoBhAp and SoMoKe insist on first way i.e. centralized fund gathering because they do NOT want other leaders and other proposals to grow !!! They are basically for self-promotion ONLY. They are all control freaks ONLY.
.
We at RRG want the proposals to grow. The activists will grow as proposals grow , because thought can move without thinkers and campaigners. But at center is the though i.e. law-drafts and NOT any faces.
.
So finally, two Right to Recall senior activists of Bhilwara namely Pawan Kumar and Ashok Jain publicized that they want to give newspaper advt in Bhilwara Bhasker to inform citizens about Jury System. So the junior activistS DIRECTLY gave money to them. My role in co-rodination , fund collection and fund dispending was --- zero.
.
Here is the link to the newspaper advt they gave -----https://www.facebook.com/pawan.jury/posts/796836247101280
.
In CoBhAp / RSS , if activists had given newspaper advt without headquaters' aadesh i.e. order, the headquater would have taken disciplinary action against them and suspended them !!!
.
Whereas we at RRG ask more and more activists to work with LOCAL senior activists and give advts !!!
.
====
.
So if you want to save India from MNC-owners' FDI, Missionaries conversions etc, then please work to publicize the law-drafts and pls stop neta-puja. Pls publicize law-drafts such as TCP-draft. MRCM = DDMRCAM drafts, JurySys drafts, wealth tax drafts, RTR-drafts, law drafts to remove Govt control over Hindu temples, law-drafts to save cows, law-drafts to expel Bangladeshi etc.
.
Please give contribution to LOCAL senior activist you trust so that he can give newspaper advt to promote these drafts.
.
Thanks in advace.
No comments:
Post a Comment