September 8, 2015 No.1
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10153021225016922
Why RSS-apex is less bad than Congress-apex , but why India under Congress-apex , as well as RSS-apex will lose against USA? And solution?
.
The KEY difference between RSS-apex and Congress-apex is
.
Congress-apex consists of married men with kids and with their own businesses and jobs
.
RSS-apex consists of UNMARRIED men with no kids and with NO businesses of their own and no jobs except jobs inside their own organizations, and most of them are social work type jobs and NOT industry jobs.
.
And This makes RSS-apex far less bad than Congress-apex..
.
The SIMILARITY between RSS-apex and Congress-apex is --- both oppose supervision of voters over them via multi-elections , RTR, Jury and referendum.
.
So so India under Congress-apex as well as RSS-apex will lose against MNC-owners and Missionaries.
.
====
.
Lets see this rule of "priest or activist MUST not marry , must not have kids and must not have a business / job of his own"
.
Jainism / Buddhism started this rule that priest must not marry , must not have kids and must not have any job / business except some social work given by monestary (sangh). Later Catholics etc adopted this rule too.
.
So when a group of N men (N = 1000s or some 200,000 in case of catholics across world) follow this rule, they do become LESS BAD in running politics or part of politics, compared to group of MARRIED MEN with business and kids running part of politics.
.
Why less bad?
.
A married man is more likely to favor his sons. Not just son, but he is also more likely to favor his relatives and his wives' relatives. So he is more likely to misuse or use his political powers and his control over political and social and religious institutions to favor his relatives. And so unmarried man with no kids will provide LESS NEPOTIC administration.
.
A man with his own business / job is also likely to favor misuse or use his political powers etc to benefit and safeguard his business. So here to, a man with no business and no job, will provide LESS SELFISH administration.
.
This was one reason why Buddhism displaced Hinduism in LARGE parts of world such as Afghanistan, large part of Pakistan, India, Burma = Myanmar , Loas, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines. And Buddhism also gained base in China , Japan due to this rule they followed
.
====
.
And Hinduism survives against Buddhism ONLY after Hindu priests also adopted this rule that priests will not marry , and will NOT have job and business, and will confine to activities run my temple or monastery
.
====
.
However, Buddhism lost against Islam , which practiced "all must meet at one place at one time every week". And in China , Buddhism survived against Islam ONLY because China had started practising "recruitment by written exam" in administration. And Hinduism too lost against Islam. And so did Catholics --- Catholics were losing till 1400 AD.
.
But, the rule that "priest must not marry , must not have kids, and must not do business / job" did slow down the rate at which Budhism , Hinduism and Catholicism were losing. The slowdown was important.
.
====
.
So "priest must not marry , must not have kids, and must not do job / business" is a rule that does have some limited merits
.
The fall side is --- these men with no business FINANCIALLY DEPENDENT to run their organizations on super-elite !!! So they become defacto agents of super-elite. eg Catholic priests upheld "divine right of king to rule" which is against "equality before God" principle of Christianity !! And Buddhist monks also upheld "King's right to Rule" aka "Mandate of Heaven" (pls google on mandate of heaven"). And RSS-apex opposed land reforms, because they were getting funds from ex-kings and temple-owners who owned miles of lands. And RSS-apex opposed ending king's privy for same reason. And RSS-apex today has become supporter of FDI , because BJP needs support of MNC-owners who own paidmedia !!! All this is because RSS doesnt need any money. But organizations spwaned by RSS , such as BJP , BMS, Seva Bharati, Ekal Vidyalaya etc need HUGE HUGE funds.
.
Another fall side is that that ---- businesses make a man more experienced and shaper. So men with businesses are more productive creativity and have less spurious creativity compared to men with no business.
.
And another fall side is --- most men, for whatever reasons, want marriage and kids. So when once makes a rule that "for certain position, one must remain unmarried and have no kids", number of applicants will fall. And so the group will have LESS variety in experiences across trades.
.
So "married men with kids and businesses, supervised by RTR , multi-election , Jury System, referendum" has far far more merits that the rule that "priests must not marry , priest must not have kids and priest must not have job / busines" !! .
.
It was because of JurySys, that European Christians were finally able to become stronger, and stronger enough to expel Arabs and Turks from Europe. And later Europeans became strong enough to takeover whole world, and even today they are advancing.
.
"RTR , multi-election , Jury System, referendum" creates a supervision system which ensures married men with kids and business ,also behave in non-nepotic and less selfish ways when they are running political, social and religious instutions. So the only advantage that "unmarried men with no kids and no business" offers --- namely non-nepotism and less selfishness, becomes available anyway.
.
And "men with business / jobs" have one plus points --- they have better experience with science / maths / engineering and are better at running a business / industry.
.
So the system of "married men with kids and with business / jobs running state and politics under supervision of RTR , Jury, referendum, multi-election" is SUPERIOR than "system of unmarried men with no kids and no business and with NO RTR , no Jury , no referendum and no multi-elections".
.
=====.
.
How does all this GYAAN apply today?
.
AAP-apex and Congress-apex insists on "system of MARRIED men with kids and with businesses and with NO RTR , no Jury , no referendum and no multi-elections".
.
RSS-apex insists on "system of unmarried men with no kids and no business and with NO RTR , no Jury , no referendum and no multi-elections".
.
So India under RSS-apex would do better than India under Congress -apex or AAP-apex
.
BUT , both RSS-apex and Congress-apex oppose supervision by citizens via Multi-elections, RTR, JurySys, referendum. Both want zero supervision by citizens.
.
And USA is following system of "married men with kids and with business / jobs running state and politics under supervision of RTR , Jury, referendum, multi-election"
.
And so , India under Congress-apex or India under AAP-apex or India under RSS-apex will lose badly against USA !!!
.
======
.
Solution?
.
Solution I propose is ---- activists should oppose demand of CoBhAp-apex to oppose multi-elections, RTR, Jury, referendum systems
,.
And activists should publicize law-drafts for TCP , RTR-judges, RTR-policechief, RTR-district-education-officer, RTR-PM, RTR-CM, RTR-Mayor, RTT-MP, RTR-etc , referendum, multi-elections , wealth tax, abolition of GST \ VAT \ excise etc. Only these drafts can save us from MNC-owners and Missionaries.
https://www.facebook.com/mehtarahulc/posts/10153021225016922
Why RSS-apex is less bad than Congress-apex , but why India under Congress-apex , as well as RSS-apex will lose against USA? And solution?
.
The KEY difference between RSS-apex and Congress-apex is
.
Congress-apex consists of married men with kids and with their own businesses and jobs
.
RSS-apex consists of UNMARRIED men with no kids and with NO businesses of their own and no jobs except jobs inside their own organizations, and most of them are social work type jobs and NOT industry jobs.
.
And This makes RSS-apex far less bad than Congress-apex..
.
The SIMILARITY between RSS-apex and Congress-apex is --- both oppose supervision of voters over them via multi-elections , RTR, Jury and referendum.
.
So so India under Congress-apex as well as RSS-apex will lose against MNC-owners and Missionaries.
.
====
.
Lets see this rule of "priest or activist MUST not marry , must not have kids and must not have a business / job of his own"
.
Jainism / Buddhism started this rule that priest must not marry , must not have kids and must not have any job / business except some social work given by monestary (sangh). Later Catholics etc adopted this rule too.
.
So when a group of N men (N = 1000s or some 200,000 in case of catholics across world) follow this rule, they do become LESS BAD in running politics or part of politics, compared to group of MARRIED MEN with business and kids running part of politics.
.
Why less bad?
.
A married man is more likely to favor his sons. Not just son, but he is also more likely to favor his relatives and his wives' relatives. So he is more likely to misuse or use his political powers and his control over political and social and religious institutions to favor his relatives. And so unmarried man with no kids will provide LESS NEPOTIC administration.
.
A man with his own business / job is also likely to favor misuse or use his political powers etc to benefit and safeguard his business. So here to, a man with no business and no job, will provide LESS SELFISH administration.
.
This was one reason why Buddhism displaced Hinduism in LARGE parts of world such as Afghanistan, large part of Pakistan, India, Burma = Myanmar , Loas, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines. And Buddhism also gained base in China , Japan due to this rule they followed
.
====
.
And Hinduism survives against Buddhism ONLY after Hindu priests also adopted this rule that priests will not marry , and will NOT have job and business, and will confine to activities run my temple or monastery
.
====
.
However, Buddhism lost against Islam , which practiced "all must meet at one place at one time every week". And in China , Buddhism survived against Islam ONLY because China had started practising "recruitment by written exam" in administration. And Hinduism too lost against Islam. And so did Catholics --- Catholics were losing till 1400 AD.
.
But, the rule that "priest must not marry , must not have kids, and must not do business / job" did slow down the rate at which Budhism , Hinduism and Catholicism were losing. The slowdown was important.
.
====
.
So "priest must not marry , must not have kids, and must not do job / business" is a rule that does have some limited merits
.
The fall side is --- these men with no business FINANCIALLY DEPENDENT to run their organizations on super-elite !!! So they become defacto agents of super-elite. eg Catholic priests upheld "divine right of king to rule" which is against "equality before God" principle of Christianity !! And Buddhist monks also upheld "King's right to Rule" aka "Mandate of Heaven" (pls google on mandate of heaven"). And RSS-apex opposed land reforms, because they were getting funds from ex-kings and temple-owners who owned miles of lands. And RSS-apex opposed ending king's privy for same reason. And RSS-apex today has become supporter of FDI , because BJP needs support of MNC-owners who own paidmedia !!! All this is because RSS doesnt need any money. But organizations spwaned by RSS , such as BJP , BMS, Seva Bharati, Ekal Vidyalaya etc need HUGE HUGE funds.
.
Another fall side is that that ---- businesses make a man more experienced and shaper. So men with businesses are more productive creativity and have less spurious creativity compared to men with no business.
.
And another fall side is --- most men, for whatever reasons, want marriage and kids. So when once makes a rule that "for certain position, one must remain unmarried and have no kids", number of applicants will fall. And so the group will have LESS variety in experiences across trades.
.
So "married men with kids and businesses, supervised by RTR , multi-election , Jury System, referendum" has far far more merits that the rule that "priests must not marry , priest must not have kids and priest must not have job / busines" !! .
.
It was because of JurySys, that European Christians were finally able to become stronger, and stronger enough to expel Arabs and Turks from Europe. And later Europeans became strong enough to takeover whole world, and even today they are advancing.
.
"RTR , multi-election , Jury System, referendum" creates a supervision system which ensures married men with kids and business ,also behave in non-nepotic and less selfish ways when they are running political, social and religious instutions. So the only advantage that "unmarried men with no kids and no business" offers --- namely non-nepotism and less selfishness, becomes available anyway.
.
And "men with business / jobs" have one plus points --- they have better experience with science / maths / engineering and are better at running a business / industry.
.
So the system of "married men with kids and with business / jobs running state and politics under supervision of RTR , Jury, referendum, multi-election" is SUPERIOR than "system of unmarried men with no kids and no business and with NO RTR , no Jury , no referendum and no multi-elections".
.
=====.
.
How does all this GYAAN apply today?
.
AAP-apex and Congress-apex insists on "system of MARRIED men with kids and with businesses and with NO RTR , no Jury , no referendum and no multi-elections".
.
RSS-apex insists on "system of unmarried men with no kids and no business and with NO RTR , no Jury , no referendum and no multi-elections".
.
So India under RSS-apex would do better than India under Congress -apex or AAP-apex
.
BUT , both RSS-apex and Congress-apex oppose supervision by citizens via Multi-elections, RTR, JurySys, referendum. Both want zero supervision by citizens.
.
And USA is following system of "married men with kids and with business / jobs running state and politics under supervision of RTR , Jury, referendum, multi-election"
.
And so , India under Congress-apex or India under AAP-apex or India under RSS-apex will lose badly against USA !!!
.
======
.
Solution?
.
Solution I propose is ---- activists should oppose demand of CoBhAp-apex to oppose multi-elections, RTR, Jury, referendum systems
,.
And activists should publicize law-drafts for TCP , RTR-judges, RTR-policechief, RTR-district-education-officer, RTR-PM, RTR-CM, RTR-Mayor, RTT-MP, RTR-etc , referendum, multi-elections , wealth tax, abolition of GST \ VAT \ excise etc. Only these drafts can save us from MNC-owners and Missionaries.
"The SIMILARITY between RSS-apex and Congress-apex is --- both oppose supervision of voters over them via multi-elections , RTR, Jury and referendum" -> What is RTR ? Can you give some more clarity like when RSS opposed multi-elections, Jury and referendum. What do you mean by Jury here ? Are you saying that RSS doesn't respect the courts & judicial system ? Are you saying that RSS doesn't support the present elections system ? How referendum is different from elections ? Are they both not same ?
ReplyDelete